“Our naval strength is increasing with our ships. I wholeheartedly believe that we will achieve new successes in the coming period,” said Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan today.
On Jan. 19, 2024 the Turkish navy officially took delivery of the TCG Istanbul, a domestically produced frigate. (STM handout)
BEIRUT — Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan was on hand at a ceremony today as the Turkish navy took delivery of four locally made ships, including the service’s first indigenous frigate.
“Our naval strength is increasing with our ships. I wholeheartedly believe that we will achieve new successes in the coming period,” Erdogan reportedly said at the delivery ceremony held at Sefine Shipyard.
The new ships are the frigate TCG Istanbul (F-515), cargo ship TCG Derya, Logistics Support Ship TCG Lt. Arif Ekmekçi, as well as armed unmanned surface vessel MARLIN, according to a shipbuilder STM. STM especially lauded the frigate, saying work on it was 80 percent localized.
“TCG Istanbul, MİLGEM İstif-Class Frigates have taken their place among the five most advanced frigates in the world thanks to their design and technologies,” said Ozgur Guleryuz, general manager of STM in a statement. “The targeted localisation rate for the Istanbul Frigate was 75 percent — a figure that we managed to increase to 80 percent through our efforts under the leadership of the SSB, and TCG İSTANBUL has thus taken the crown as the warship with the highest localisation rate in Türkiye.”
He added that the national frigate is equipped with local electronic warfare systems, combat management system and air-guided projectile.
“The frigate is equipped with advanced indigenously built systems, such as Havelsan’s Advent battle management system, MIDLAS vertical launcher system, and CENK-S AESA radar system manufactured by Aselsan,” Can Kasapoglu, director of defense research at the Istanbul-based Edam think tank, told Breaking Defense.
He said that Turkey already has shipbuilding infrastructure, which is critical, “but equipping the ship with such systems is another achievement.”
The Thunderbolt II, colloquially named the Warthog, is a devastating ground attack aircraft that proved its worth in the first Gulf War
What kind of jet fighter should next be sent to Ukraine to accomplish air superiority over Russia has become a hotly debated subject as the war continues.
The United States, Norway and Denmark have donated their aircraft to the cause, but questions remain about what other weapons the Ukrainians will go into battle with.
However, the head of Ukraine’s ground forces said his country will need the American A-10 Thunderbolt II, affectionately called the “Warthog”, as well as other US aircraft.
While the accident was very expensive in terms of the damage, nobody was hurt (Picture: Fill Your Boots X)
A collision involving two Royal Navy warships caused about £25m worth of damage, Forces News understands, with the accident thought to have been caused by a wiring issue.
HMS Chiddingfold crashed into HMS Bangor while trying to berth in Bahrain Harbour.
HMS Bangor was already berthed when the incident happened, and no personnel on either vessel were injured.
It is unknown how long HMS Bangor will be out of action for, while HMS Chiddingfold only suffered minor damage.
Forces News understands a wiring issue on Chiddingfold caused the crash. As a result HMS Bangor was left with a huge hole in a cabin above the waterline.
The Defence Secretary had previously denied the crash was the result of incompetence.
Grant Shapps told Sky News’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that “sometimes accidents and incidents happen” adding that a full investigation is underway.
When he was asked if it incompetence was to blame, Mr Shapps said: “We don’t say it’s incompetence when we see an aircraft come down – a very rare occasion – just as this would be a rare occasion.
“It’s right to leave the investigators some time to work out exactly what’s gone wrong. Something clearly did and we need to see what it is.”
This is not the first incident involving HMS Chiddingfold, as in April 2021 she struck HMS Penzance when attempting to berth at the UK’s naval base in Bahrain.
The collision in the Gulf led to approximately £100,000 worth of damage.
Popular social media account Fill Your Boots shared the video of the most recent collision on X, formerly known as Twitter.
Two U.S. Navy decommissioned Leahy-class guided missile cruisers are moored in the Pearl Harbor Naval Ships Intermediate Maintenance Facility, Hawaii (USA), on 4 June 2000. The inboard ship is USS Worden (CG-18). She was sunk on 17 June 2000 in a live fire missile shoot by units involved in exercise RIMPAC 2000. The outboard ship is USS Reeves (CG-24). She was sunk on 31 May 2001 as a target ship off the coast of Queensland, Australia. Five Newport News-class tank landing ships are also visible.
The U.S. Navy guided missile cruiser USS Worden (CG-18) arrives at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii (USA), on 1 June 1991.
The U.S. Navy guided missile cruiser USS Worden (CG-18) arriving in San Francisco Bay, California (USA), on 12 July 1986. The ship was participating in a midshipmen’s summer training cruise.
She was laid down in May 1902, launched in May 1904, and commissioned into the Atlantic Fleet in February 1906. The ship was armed with an offensive battery of four 12-inch (300 mm) guns and eight 8-inch (200 mm) guns, and she was capable of a top speed of 19 knots (35 km/h; 22 mph)
The home front: Defence Force’s $3 billion housing problem
Jonathan Killick
January 21, 2024, • 05:00am
Share
An example of housing owned by the Defence Force in Devonport. GOOGLE MAPS / SUPPLIED
New Zealand’s armed services are on the defence in a battle for the home front – with hundreds of government-owned houses that have fallen into disarray.
It’s also a war of attrition. The Defence Force has reportedly lost roughly a third of its uniformed staff in the last three years, which it attributes in part to substandard homes.
In a recent report, it said that while its houses would meet Healthy Homes standards, they would still be “unfit for modern living” without urgent intervention.
It said that military homes – provided for defence personnel and their families – were posing health risks and could cause “housing-related stress”.
The solution, according to the Defence Force, is a $1.011 billion cash injection over 25 years, in addition to $2b from its existing budget. This would yield 1628 “modern quality” homes.
For this money, 227 new houses would be built, while 877 would be refurbished, and a further 524 would be leased from the private market.
Stuff heard from former and serving defence personnel who spoke about their situations on condition of anonymity.
The Crown has now been obliged to hand over 270 of the navy’s houses to Marutūāhu under a settlement GOOGLE MAPS / SUPPLIED
“The armed forces are struggling hugely with retention and I think it’s probably at a tipping point, but no one would admit it,” one said.
They said their house was poorly insulated with draughty windows, and running a heat pump to warm it was expensive. It had been cheap rent that had “made the equation work”.
They have a family in navy-owned subsidised housing, living in a four-bedroom house which costs around $320 a week.
It sounds like a great deal, but the reality is more complicated.
Defence’s General Manager of Estate Strategy Phil Gurnsey points out that Defence sets its rents based on the going rate in Manawatū, and in Auckland homes could be up to $350 a week cheaper than the market rate.
However, personnel say that has to be put into context of a hard-won pay increase, announced in May. They got an average rise of 30%.
Meanwhile, one defence employee has had a 50% increase in rent compared to three years ago, and was expecting a further 35% increase in April 2024. They said it meant they had effectively had a pay cut.
“I know of single parents who struggle to make ends meet. Even as an officer, they are living pay cheque to pay cheque,” one personnel said.
According to the Government’s careers website, navy officers start on $51,000 and can progress to between $70,000-$84,000 when they reach Ensign level. Lieutenants can earn up to $117,000.
Royal NZ Navy frigate Te Kaha returns to friends and family at Devonport Naval base in 2011. Pictured is Petty Officer Brent Hill with daughter Charlotte. (File image) PHIL DOYLE / STUFF
Broadly, personnel described how housing had the most impact on the cost of living for young families, which put pressure on mid-career personnel. On this, Defence agrees.
Defence said that it had modelled the future need of houses based on the number of personnel with more than five years but fewer than nine.
“This group are critical to military outputs, have the skills to be fully effective in their role and are known to be at a higher risk of leaving the Defence Force, often due to family reasons.”
The problem is perhaps most acutely felt by the navy, which has its primary base of operations at Devonport, one of Auckland’s most expensive and congested suburbs.
The Devonport Naval Base is situated on prime waterfront real estate in Auckland. CAROLINE WILLIAMS / STUFF
The Crown has now been obliged to hand over 270 of the navy’s houses to Marutūāhu under a settlement, which will leave just 27 homes in the suburb.
It comes as the navy has completed its 32nd report in 26 years on whether it is worthwhile holding onto its base in Devonport and looking at the case for shifting it to Whangārei.
“[It] presents the opportunity to take into account support systems for navy personnel, including improved wellbeing, better work/life balance and improved housing accessibility compared to Auckland.”
It was decided that there would be at least a partial migration, with Defence being instructed to press ahead with a business case for a supplementary training facility in Northland.
The report still found that Devonport had a “superior” deep water channel and a presence should be retained. A full move would cost $945 million more than staying, it said.
There’s another issue. Personnel are only permitted to live in navy-subsidised housing for six years, after which they either have to hope for an extension or find a new home.
Ex-naval personnel attend Veterans Day at the naval base in Davenport, Auckland. CHRIS MCKEEN / STUFF
It’s a numbers game. Defence employs 9600 personnel, 2700 reserves and 3100 civilian staff, and has 1821 houses.
“I’m here because I thoroughly enjoy serving, but if I have to live in the Auckland market on a non-competitive salary, I will take my skills elsewhere and not have to leave my family,” as one put it.
It’s said that most Defence jobs are at least 5% below their civilian equivalent; some as high as 18%.
One personnel told Stuff they had already moved their family north of Auckland in order to afford housing, but this had come with the added cost of petrol.
In the meantime, the Defence Force is changing mode from landlord to tenant. It plans to rent 243 properties near Devonport, 75 in Papakura, 34 in Wellington and increase the number it leases at Whenuapai to 172.
In what appears to be a trial, it has already leased 15 two-bedroom units and seven three-bedroom units in a brand-new development in Northcote.
In its housing pitch, Defence said that the nature of the job was that it had to deploy personnel to various locations and having available housing supported that.
“It allows the Defence Force to post personnel where they are needed to deliver military outputs, including locations with high cost of housing or limited housing supply.”
How did our armed forces get to the point of needing billions to prop up its housing?
Rent for Defence Force homes is based on rates for Manawatū, where the army has a large base. DAVID UNWIN / STUFF
According to the pitch document prepared for former defence minister Andrew Little, most of the stock is over 60 years old and “does not meet modern functionality or is in a marginal physical condition”.
In the last five years, the military had been able to stump up $10.5 million on maintenance of its housing stock.
Gurnsey told Stuff that Defence had gained initial approval from the previous government for the $3 billion programme, dubbed “Homes for Families”.
Now, it is preparing a full implementation business case for the new regime.
Stuff asked newly-appointed Defence Minister Judith Collins whether she intended to oversee its implementation, but received a non-committal response.
In Apra Harbor, Guam, December 1952, while en route to the U.S. following her third Korean War combat tour. During this voyage, she carried President-Elect Dwight D. Eisenhower and his party from Guam to Pearl Harbor.
